News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: Server installs simplified (and built from source) by sweetass on Sunday May 06, 2012 @09:49AM (#3935111)
How is this different from a script with apt-get or yum? I understand there are some, but not that significant benefit. Did I miss something?
Re:Show HN: Server installs simplified (and built from source) by lnguyen on Sunday May 06, 2012 @03:46PM (#3936087)
With apt-get and yum you're installing pre-built binaries. This works well if that's all you need to do and are okay with the versions that are installed (typically not the latest unless it's a new distribution).

Once you start having to download and build source for apps/libraries that aren't pre-packaged you can run into issues about version compatibilities, where files are located, do you need to download additional packages (*-dev), etc. Having a service that takes care of this for you solves a lot of headaches (part of why rayburst got built in the first place).

Re:Show HN: Server installs simplified (and built from source) by sweetass on Monday May 07, 2012 @02:10AM (#3937830)
Then it sounds like gentoo emerge for other distro. It is useful for setup the software stack base, but I still have to log into the server to configure the software and deploy my code.

In my opinion, you either use PaaS or use chef/puppet, depending on your case.

Re:Show HN: Server installs simplified (and built from source) by lnguyen on Monday May 07, 2012 @03:34AM (#3938055)
The issue is that unless you have standards such as directory locations and structure, users and permissions, there isn't a way to automate the process of code deployment even with chef/puppet.

PaaS works because the provider has a standard and forces you to follow them. I don't mean that in any negative sense. I was in SCM for a number of years and know that kind of enforcement is necessary if you want to have any kind of repeatable, automatable and supportable deployments.