I don't want to get into a political argument, man. I think most anarchists can't really agree on what a definition is. It's unfalsifiable.

Just go read some stuff I guess. Everyone thinks it's accelerationism and while there are extremists who inhabit both camps, like every other ideology, it's mostly just a community focused reduction in authoritarian power structures thing.

As I said elsewhere, there are actual agreed upon definitions for this stuff. Careful not to go too far into the "everything is unknowable" hole.

I'm also an anarchist. I guarantee that the person above me and I disagree about some political things. But also, I guarantee we do agree about a lot of the foundational thought and theory. Things like mutual aid, the right to self determination, local communities knowing what their communities need, and more.

Anarchist theory has a ton of practical and academic work over the past few centuries. It's not "the purge", it's a pretty well defined set of principles centered around building a society that primarily focuses on well being for all.

It means there is no higher authority to appeal to in a disagreement.

Then why say anything in the first place because facts don't matter and everything is unknowable?