FCC rules AI-generated voices in robocalls illegal

Re:FCC rules AI-generated voices in robocalls illegal by dclowd9901 on Friday February 09, 2024 @10:27PM (#39323285)

Consider this: the kind of people who wouldn’t know how to do this otherwise are exactly the kind of people I don’t want given a die cut model for how to do it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:FCC rules AI-generated voices in robocalls illegal by jakogut on Saturday February 10, 2024 @03:44AM (#39324631)

Meanwhile illegal full-auto Glock switches are flooding into urban areas such as Chicago across the country, ordered overseas from Aliexpress completely unimpeded, because the ATF would rather go after people that aren't violent criminals.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:FCC rules AI-generated voices in robocalls illegal by rpmisms on Saturday February 10, 2024 @02:16PM (#39329309)

Funnily enough, they're pushing towards common use, which makes for an interesting legal argument that giggle switches are no longer dangerous and unusual.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:FCC rules AI-generated voices in robocalls illegal by jakogut on Saturday February 10, 2024 @02:24PM (#39329381)

Then you have devices like FRTs and Super Safeties that comply with the letter of the law in being semi-automatic and still shooting fast.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:FCC rules AI-generated voices in robocalls illegal by rpmisms on Monday February 12, 2024 @02:24PM (#39349109)

And the ATF still makes them presumptively illegal, abusing the courts' deference to them.

[ Parent | on HN ]