News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on /story/39313623. Parent comment

Re: by electroly on Friday February 09, 2024 @07:50PM (#39322330)
Definitely--I recommend this after you've reached the point where you're writing huge checks to AWS. Maybe this is just assumed but I've never seen anyone else add that nuance to the "just use RDS" advice. It's always just "RDS is worth it" full stop, as in this article.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re: by Aeolun on Friday February 09, 2024 @08:00PM (#39322401)
To some extend that is probably true, because when you’ve built a business that needs a 500k/year database fully on RDS it’s already priced into your profits, and switching to a self-hosted database will seem unacceptably risky for something that works just fine.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re: by groestl on Saturday February 10, 2024 @02:55AM (#39324437)
> it’s already priced into your profits

Assuming you have any. You might not, because of AWS.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re: by sroussey on Friday February 09, 2024 @08:45PM (#39322706)
I mean, just use supabase instead. So much easier than RDS. Why even deal with AWS directly? Might as well have a Colo if you need AWS.
[ Parent | on HN ]