I won't discuss this further.
It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.
I didn't say it can't be transmitted elsewhere.
I said that it was expensive to do so and I've seen with my own two eyes the proof of that expense. The proof of that expense is that it hasn't been done yet, despite years of opportunities and the fact that it can be done (which I agree with you on).
For the record, my salary does not depend on this at all.
As I said, I no longer mine anything and haven't since ETH went to PoS. Which, by the way, consumes very little power now.
>It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.
Little sneaky to put that last comment there, useless completely and spiteful? Just because your hypothesis turned out to be wrong doesn't mean you cannot admit it
Cryptocurrency miners rank worse than oil and coal executives in my book.
(I've seen nothing to suggest my hypothesis is wrong.)
The map shows what I'm talking about very clearly... all of the power is either used for the local Alcoa plants (there are several) or gets exported elsewhere.
There is little usage for that power locally (it is in the middle of nowhere, frozen in the winters and otherwise wasteland surrounded by superfund sites thanks to the smelting).
It also isn't like you can just plug in 115kv line into a 230kv line and call it a day. It would require new construction to send that power somewhere else, which is expensive and hard to justify over someone just paying for the power to stay right there.
I never said anything about 'generating capacity'. The dam, where I also went for a tour, is ~2k mw total, part goes to Canada and the rest to the US. The Massena facility has an allocation of that power.