Re:Just 137 crypto miners use 2.3% of total U.S. power
by fromMars on Friday February 09, 2024 @11:37AM
(#39316685)
What happened with Ethereum's proof of stake? Have there been successful alternatives that eliminate the need for mining?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Just 137 crypto miners use 2.3% of total U.S. power
by patriksvensson on Friday February 09, 2024 @12:06PM
(#39317199)
It's running proof of stake, successfully for over 512 days!
Uses validators instead of mining, the power footprint of the ENTIRE network was reduced by 99.995%.
Crypto isn't power inefficient, BITCOIN MINING is power inefficient.
Can't wait for the typewriter (Bitcoin) to be replaced by the computer (Ethereum).
Re:Just 137 crypto miners use 2.3% of total U.S. power
by almenon on Friday February 09, 2024 @11:49AM
(#39316913)
Ethereum switched to proof of stake a while ago. So yes. Hardcore crypto fans don't like it because theoretically it could be subject to the 51% attack. Personally, Ethereum is big enough where
A) I don't think that attack is likely and B) the efficiency gains are worth the risk
Disclaimer: I have Ethereum so i benefit from other people buying it. I do honestly think it's better for the environment.
Re:Just 137 crypto miners use 2.3% of total U.S. power
by FabHK on Friday February 09, 2024 @12:01PM
(#39317122)
PoS instead of PoW is about 1000x more efficient, meaning that instead of being about 1,000,000,000x more wasteful than the work it effectively does it's only about 1,000,000x more wasteful.