News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sudo for Windows by swamplander on Friday February 09, 2024 @08:52AM (#39314830)
So Microsoft implicitly admits DOS sucks and creates a PowerShell prompt.

Then Microsoft doubles down and introduces a better prompt called WSL - the Windows Subsystem for Linux because the Windows command prompt still sucks... and this is just a Ubuntu VM in Windows.

And now they implement Sudo?

Microsoft hasn't learned the first lesson of holes - when you find yourself in one, stop digging.

Re:Sudo for Windows by ramijames on Friday February 09, 2024 @10:07AM (#39315510)
This is a really good illustration for why I hate using Microsoft products. They don't commit to one vision long-term. They build a bunch of competing visions, and all feel half-assed. From a user's perspective this means that if I want to perform some task I likely either have a clunky experience, or worse, I end up having to use multiple similar tools to do it.

Very bleh.

Re:Sudo for Windows by hu3 on Friday February 09, 2024 @09:01AM (#39314906)
Reducing WSL, which can virtualize multiple Linux in parallel, including Linux GUI programs, use GPU and run Docker at near-native speed, to a mere prompt seems dishonest.
Re:Sudo for Windows by eska on Friday February 09, 2024 @10:48AM (#39315987)
I wish they committed to implementing more of the POSIX standard instead. They only ever implemented an initial version, and then added tiny parts of it in incompatible ways.
Re:Sudo for Windows by a321neo on Friday February 09, 2024 @01:06PM (#39318140)
This doesn't make any sense. PowerShell and WSL serve entirely different purposes. PowerShell is bash-but-better for Windows. WSL is a developer-oriented way of running Linux/Unix software on Windows.