News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Samsung Galaxy S III: The First Smartphone Designed E... by oskarth on Friday May 04, 2012 @09:01PM (#3930994)
You'd be surprised what consumers can mistake a product for. In many people's eyes, iPhone == smartphone. It'd be a relatively simple mistake to make if you are a elderly non-techie.
Re:The Samsung Galaxy S III: The First Smartphone Designed E... by zobzu on Friday May 04, 2012 @11:12PM (#3931211)
Then they should read what's written on the box because its pretty damn clear. I mean going by that kind of thinking, one can mistake vodka and water. In fact its probably a LOT easier to mistake vodka and water than an iPhone 4 and a Galaxy S2.

Vodka, water, same color. iPhone, Galaxy S.. not even the same color. Just a vaguely similar shape. Heh.

Re:The Samsung Galaxy S III: The First Smartphone Designed E... by sbuk on Saturday May 05, 2012 @05:26AM (#3931747)
That's the whole point! The S and the SII weren't 'vaguely similar' to the iPhone, they were almost identical.
Re:The Samsung Galaxy S III: The First Smartphone Designed E... by zobzu on Saturday May 05, 2012 @09:34PM (#3933853)
That's very much incorrect. The SII doesn't remotely look than an iPhone 4, except both are squared... different COLOR, different SIZE, different BUTTONS...
Re:The Samsung Galaxy S III: The First Smartphone Designed E... by sbuk on Sunday May 06, 2012 @11:16AM (#3935294)
Both are offered in black and white. Although the SII was bigger the aesthetic is practically identical. You can say that you disagree, but to suggest my statement is very much incorrect is off the mark.
Re:The Samsung Galaxy S III: The First Smartphone Designed E... by CookWithMe on Sunday May 06, 2012 @04:45AM (#3934564)
So, if they ended up buying an android phone, does that really count as a mistake? After all, they didnt really want an iPhone, they wanted a smartphone, and that is what they got.