Re:Why Atlassian is to Software as Apple is to Design
by thushan on Friday May 04, 2012 @04:33PM
(#3930226)
Amen. Last time I used it, it was a mess beyond belief. Code intermingling with presentation layer. Dependencies upon dependencies. A case study of bad software engineering.
Re:Why Atlassian is to Software as Apple is to Design
by icefox on Friday May 04, 2012 @04:25PM
(#3930184)
There is probably already a company out there making awesome corporate wiki's and they are growing every year, but of course by the time you get it it will be out of date and there will some some new little company...
Re:Why Atlassian is to Software as Apple is to Design
by slantyyz on Friday May 04, 2012 @04:31PM
(#3930210)
When I saw the headline, I was thinking the exact same thing. I hate Confluence, I hate JIRA.
I don't hate Bitbucket, but that's an acquisition product, not a home grown product.
Re:Why Atlassian is to Software as Apple is to Design
by cmelbye on Saturday May 05, 2012 @04:06AM
(#3931633)
Do you think there's demand for a "corporate wiki"? I've been toying with the idea of that on the side for months, but I'm unsure of the demand for it. It seems like wikis are something that people don't enjoy using and don't have a need for. What are your experiences? Where does Confluence fall short?
Re:Why Atlassian is to Software as Apple is to Design
by Gring on Sunday May 06, 2012 @06:18PM
(#3936538)
To sell a successful corporate wiki, you need hundreds of plug-ins to handle all those special cases that each company inevitably has. That would be your biggest stumbling block, because creating those takes time, and that's where Confluence trumps all others.
Where it falls short? Basically everywhere else. There is no taste.
If you want our business, create a wiki that puts the content front and center, and remove everything else by default. Then let us add our 3 extension wishes, while still staying minimalist. It's not that difficult.
Unfortunately, it seems that either the chief software architect at Confluence is not up to the task, or that the company values quick crappy changes in favor of good design.
Good luck with your endeavor!
If this incredibly crappy product sells itself, then it's only because there is nothing better. If you don't know what your next company should do - please consider creating a better corporate wiki. Confluence is truly an abomination.