Appendix is not, in fact, useless

Re:Appendix is not, in fact, useless by notfed on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @07:19PM (#39296128)

This is why many of us are excited about LLMs. This.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Appendix is not, in fact, useless by knodi123 on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @07:26PM (#39296190)

"Finally, I'll be able to automate turning a short science paragraph into a 10 page story with human interest content!"

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Appendix is not, in fact, useless by quickthrower2 on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @08:31PM (#39296731)

Until Google uses an LLM on every indexed entry. Then people might start writing stuff for that which might correlate more with what users want to read!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Appendix is not, in fact, useless by lobsterthief on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @07:50PM (#39296430)

Yep, it goes both ways.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Appendix is not, in fact, useless by delfinom on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @08:17PM (#39296635)

* with additional fluff content because Google mandated it to show up in search results.

Seriously, the reason why all recipe sites online suddenly became autobiographies was a policy change by google prioritizing such.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Appendix is not, in fact, useless by avg_dev on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @08:47PM (#39296833)

I wish an LLM had obviated this thread from the discussion

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Appendix is not, in fact, useless by leptons on Thursday February 08, 2024 @04:36AM (#39300040)

So you won't have to write 10 paragraphs of inane filler, a computer will do it for you?

[ Parent | on HN ]