Re:Thirteen Ways of Looking at Art
by chickenWing on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @04:28PM
(#39294535)
We should resist the temptation to create "evolutionary just-so stories" to explain human behaviors.
Re:Thirteen Ways of Looking at Art
by actionfromafar on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @03:31PM
(#39293886)
Isn't the human liver also very good at breaking down toxins?
Re:Thirteen Ways of Looking at Art
by progmetaldev on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @05:16PM
(#39295042)
Specifically in regards to flowers, I believe the vast majority of flowering plants are not fruiting, so there would need to be some other case here. More likely not having to do with humans, and more to do with attracting pollinators.
Re:Thirteen Ways of Looking at Art
by TacticalCoder on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @06:59PM
(#39295975)
> why do humans have superior color vision vs. almost all other mammalian creatures?
Why limit to mammals? Female birds of paradise are way more likely to mate with the male birds of paradise that do exhibit the most harmonious colors (to our human eyes: so female birds of paradise happens to share the same taste as humans when it comes to harmony of colors).
A dominant theory is that natural selection favored individuals with extended long wave (red) perception. Better color perception enhanced locating high-quality food resources and avoiding toxic plants. Human vision also resolves finer detail than many mammals.
Flowers are worth noticing, after all, they're precursors to fruit which may be edible when ripe. Appreciating the form and color of flowers isn't a random phenomenon. In its present-day form, like most things human, the "beauty of flowers" is a complex phenomenon arising out of interacting biological, social and environmental factors.