News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Should Error Messages Apologize? by photochemsyn on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @01:32PM (#39292319)
I like the idea of haiku error messages (as in Neil Gaiman/Terry Pratchett's Good Omens). "Site not found" becomes, with some LLM assistance:

Amidst cyberspace vast,

Site elusive, lost in void,

Unreachable code.

Re:Should Error Messages Apologize? by rzzzt on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @03:33PM (#39293923)
A Salon article inspired many examples from readers: https://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/error-haiku.en.html

(I could swear that one of these appeared in BeOS' NetPositive browser if you visited a site without network access... but now I'm not so sure.)

Edit: now I'm sure: https://8325.org/haiku/

Re:Should Error Messages Apologize? by seabass-labrax on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @06:01PM (#39295517)
I find this one hilarious, and rather relevant to this thread:

"Errors have occurred.

We won't tell you where or why.

Lazy programmers."

Thank you for sharing them :)

Re:Should Error Messages Apologize? by jerbear4328 on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @02:43PM (#39293261)
That isn't a valid haiku, and it's much less clear, in my opinion. If you give me a nice big "404 Not Found" up front and then include a poem, HTTP cat, or easter egg, that would give the page personality while still being immediately useful.
Re:Should Error Messages Apologize? by seabass-labrax on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @06:00PM (#39295502)
Of course, it is still both a 404 HTTP response and a proper HTML webpage - so both the user agent and the website have an opportunity to explain the error. If both of them try to be funny, though, that's no good.