Re:Danish schools will no longer be allowed to use Chromeboo...
by logifail on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @06:57AM
(#39287460)
> laptops on classes where you need them
Apart from lessons directly about computing and/or technology - of which there may be a handful of hours per week in a regular highschool - the number of subjects which "need a laptop" in high school is vanishingly small.
> politicians use binary yes/no options because they are lazy and/or incapable of working or thinking harder
Lobbyists don't even use binary. They're always pushing their product.
Re:Danish schools will no longer be allowed to use Chromeboo...
by kuschku on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @07:42AM
(#39287843)
A lot of natural sciences classes benefit from doing experiments. And those are much easier and more rewarding when you've got probes connected to different parts of the experiment logging their data to a laptop.
My old high school used the LabPro/LoggerPro platform for that, and it became a core part of how physics and chemistry was taught. https://www.vernier.com/product/labpro/
Re:Danish schools will no longer be allowed to use Chromeboo...
by nonrandomstring on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @06:55AM
(#39287437)
It seems common to confuse teaching children about technology and
having children taught by technology.
The former is essential to a modern economy and way of life.
The latter is road to laziness, poor mental health and terrible learning outcomes.
If we are talking about high schools and mainly technical high schools banning tech is contrary to the point of the school. I think a balanced view is better: carrying laptops on classes where you need them and also adapt classes if laptop could be beneficial.
Even in elementary school, my child has robotics.
In general, I think politicians use binary yes/no options because they are lazy and/or incapable of working or thinking harder.