Re:Alaska Airlines flight 1282 NTSB preliminary report [pdf]
by ethbr1 on Tuesday February 06, 2024 @06:16PM
(#39282241)
A key point I read somewhere in the accusations is that non-Boeing contractors (e.g. Spirit) by policy cannot have access to CMES.
Consequently, you have a system of record that a major party to work doesn't have access to.
As we've all seen, this leads to "actual coordination" being instead done in a system all involved parties do have access to (SAT).
Which inevitably leads to a desync between CMES (SOR by fiat) and SAT (SOR in practice).
Re:Alaska Airlines flight 1282 NTSB preliminary report [pdf]
by calebpeterson on Tuesday February 06, 2024 @06:25PM
(#39282318)
SOR - system of record
SAT - ?
CMES - ?
Re:Alaska Airlines flight 1282 NTSB preliminary report [pdf]
by ethbr1 on Tuesday February 06, 2024 @06:30PM
(#39282390)
They're described in parent's first link. Boeing systems.
Re:Alaska Airlines flight 1282 NTSB preliminary report [pdf]
by michael1999 on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @03:17PM
(#39293692)
But isn't that exactly the underlying fraud? Boeing and Spirit are conspiring to cover up Spirit's deficient delivery by allowing Spirit to work onsite at Renton and do post-delivery re-work and pretend that it is as-if delivered, and _outside_ Boeing's system of record. To reject the delivery and wait for Spirit to fix would ruin their delivery schedule, so they fudge it and muddle along.
https://www.seattletimes.com/business/boeing-aerospace/faa-p....
Read https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/safety/146074-boeing-inte...
And then this from the doc: "The investigation continues to determine what manufacturing documents were used to authorize the opening and closing of the left MED plug during the rivet rework."
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/24410269/report_dca24...