It was my intent to exclude microscopic commercial operators doing charter flights, tourism, and other similar activities.
I sincerely apologize for the omission, I did not recognize that that Comair flight was operating under the United banner.
I hope you can recognize that a company privately operating a fleet of seven floatplanes is not particularly relevant to a discussion about the safety of mass passenger air travel, in much the same way that a carnival operating a rollercoaster is not meaningful when discussing passenger rail.
They were, prior to the their closure, the oldest operating airline in the US and something like #3 worldwide, post-dating only KLM and one of the other European flag carriers. (Lufthansa, maybe? I don't have the list handy)
I'm also pretty sure that you, nor anyone you know, nor anyone they know has ever flown on Chalk's.
Your whole approach here feels rather bad faith/no true Scotsman-y. Of course you’ll have no fatal crashes if you say every fatal crash doesn’t count for some reason or another as not a real crash.
Indeed it does not, which made the omission more strange or innocent. What was ridiculous was the apologia subthread.
> small tourism operators who are often far less rigorous in their safety practices, with relatively low-hour pilots.
There have been some improvements (in part due to these accidents) but this isn’t so far off from the regionals which was definitely a factor in both Comair and Colgan.
But crucially the majors are going to sell you a connecting ticket on them like any other, and they code share and mile just the same. Many of them are wholly owned to boot.