Re:Apple fixes zero-day bug in Apple Vision Pro that 'may ha...
by orangepanda on Sunday February 04, 2024 @04:30PM
(#39254688)
Sure it helps but does it _have_ to be on a separate chip? In ye olden days when everything else had crashed and was frozen, skype calls still kept working
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Apple fixes zero-day bug in Apple Vision Pro that 'may ha...
by michaelt on Sunday February 04, 2024 @04:40PM
(#39254780)
Historically, it's generally been cheaper and easier to have two chips than to persuade a consumer or server OS to provide reliable time guarantees.
Re:Apple fixes zero-day bug in Apple Vision Pro that 'may ha...
by charcircuit on Sunday February 04, 2024 @04:48PM
(#39254850)
Hypervisors like that already exist and are needed by cloud providers.
Re:Apple fixes zero-day bug in Apple Vision Pro that 'may ha...
by bpye on Sunday February 04, 2024 @05:53PM
(#39255369)
Well, even in that context you have AWS for example doing control plane operations on a different SoC - https://docs.aws.amazon.com/whitepapers/latest/security-desi...
Re:Apple fixes zero-day bug in Apple Vision Pro that 'may ha...
by threeseed on Sunday February 04, 2024 @05:56PM
(#39255383)
I think it's more the fact that the M2 chip is used across multiple product lines that don't need the unique capabilities of the R1 chip.
Re:Apple fixes zero-day bug in Apple Vision Pro that 'may ha...
by teaearlgraycold on Sunday February 04, 2024 @06:04PM
(#39255455)
I think it makes sense. The parts of the system that need to respond within certain time windows because of physics run in the R1 (presumably, “realtime 1”). Everything else is just an iPad, which currently runs on the M2.