Re:Analysts Estimate Nvidia Owns 98% of the Data Center GPU ...
by latchkey on Thursday February 01, 2024 @02:53PM
(#39220433)
All of what you're saying is true and I can't argue that.
The only difference is that previously you couldn't even rent time on these super high end AIA's. They were reserved for supercomputers only. Even the MI250x sku is government/research only and even I am unable to buy that over the MI250.
So, we need to work on building that developer flywheel. My view is that if you can rent some time on one of these systems, that is a good first step. Nowhere else can you load a model into 192gb of RAM on a top end system.
Re:Analysts Estimate Nvidia Owns 98% of the Data Center GPU ...
by wafngar on Thursday February 01, 2024 @03:00PM
(#39220548)
For AI you have to support PyTorch. That works well now on the big AMD GPUs. Consumer gpu capabilities do not matter here.
That "no consumer hardware support" sounds stupid, but people getting into ML/AI, grad students, etc want to be able to mess around and develop/prototype on local hardware they already own.
You cannot do that with ROCM, because they only support a very, very small number of consumer-level cards - and very oddly, it's a mix of the very high end and low end, nothing in the middle.
AMD is also massively behind hardware-wise with only the current 7xxx series cards that just came out having AI-specific hardware, whereas NVIDIA has had tensor cores for three generations of their cards.
But of course AMD can't do anything right, so they nerfed the GPU's graphics processing cores when they added the AI stuff, making the cards a worse deal from a pure gaming standpoint. The 7000 series cars are basically a tiny bump at best, and in many games worse, than the 6000 series equivalents. Their only advantage is better hardware video encoding support and somewhat better power consumption.