News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I don't want anything your AI generates by handoflixue on Thursday February 01, 2024 @06:53AM (#39214998)
Human artists have been training on the same content for decades and no one seemed to complain. You can argue that machines should be held to a different set of legal and ethical standards, but it's certainly not obvious.

Most factories are designed based on vast amounts of prior manual labor, so it's not like "automating a manual process based on analyzing existing methods" is new, either. Why is it okay to automate the knowledge of all those other craftsmen, but not that of painters?

Re:I don't want anything your AI generates by LegitShady on Thursday February 01, 2024 @10:49AM (#39217192)
AI are not human artists, so there's no connection to your point and the discussion.
Re:I don't want anything your AI generates by lesser_value on Thursday February 01, 2024 @12:30PM (#39218595)
you are just making shit up to suit your narrative at this point.
Re:I don't want anything your AI generates by LegitShady on Thursday February 01, 2024 @03:07PM (#39220653)
So ai are human artists?
Re:I don't want anything your AI generates by firebat45 on Thursday February 01, 2024 @01:40PM (#39219520)
You could just as easily claim that since AI are not human artists that copyright does not apply to them.
Re:I don't want anything your AI generates by LegitShady on Thursday February 01, 2024 @03:07PM (#39220648)
It applies to whoever uses them as a tool. If you say copyright doesn't apply to a photocopier because it isn't human that doesn't mean it suddenly doesn't apply to you. It's just a bad argument.
Re:I don't want anything your AI generates by xigoi on Thursday February 01, 2024 @02:00PM (#39219744)
Human artists are not robotically ingesting terabytes of content.