>Arm now claims to hold a 10.1% share of the cloud computing market, although that's primarily due to Amazon and its increasing use of homegrown Arm chips. According to TrendForce, Amazon Web Services (AWS) was using its custom Graviton chips in 15% of all server deployments in 2021.
https://www.fool.com/investing/2023/09/23/arm-holdings-data-...
[1] https://www.theregister.com/2023/02/14/google_prepares_its_o...
I can get a top of the line Xeon Gold basically next day with a incredibly high quality out of band management from a reputable server provider. (HP, Dell).
Ampere? Give it 6 months, €5,000 and maybe you can get one, from Gigabyte. Not known for server quality.
(yes, I'm salty, I have 4 of these CPUs and it took a really long time to get them while costing just as much as AMD EPYC Milan's).
Amazon has its own ARM CPUs on AWS, and you can get them on demand, too.
Xeons and EPYCs are great for "big loads", however some supercomputer centers also started to install "experimental" ARM partitions.
The future is bright not because Intel is floundering, but there'll be at least three big CPU producers (ARM, AMD and Intel).
Also, don't have prejudices about "brands". most motherboard brands can design server-class hardware if they wish. They're just making different trade-offs because of the market they're in.
I used servers which randomly fried parts of their motherboard when see some "real" load. Coming one morning and having no connectivity because a top of the line 2 port gigabit onboard Ethernet fried itself on a top of the line, flagship server is funny in its own way.
I'm guessing this has increased since 2021. I've moved the majority of our AWS workloads to ARM because the price savings (it mostly 'just works'). If companies are starting to tighten their belts, this could accelerate even more ARM adoption.
They certainly tried selling their chips below cost to move into markets ARM dominated, but "contra revenue" couldn't save them.
> Intel Corp.’s Contra-Revenue Strategy Was a Huge Waste of Money
https://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/04/21/intel-corp...
So much of Intels decline reeks of arrogant MBAs.
Intel never "crushed" ARM. Intel completely failed to develop a mobile processor and ARM has a massive marketshare there.
ARM has always beaten the crap out of Intel at performance per watt, which turned out to be extremely important both in mobile and data center scale.