News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon terminates iRobot deal, vacuum maker to lay off 31... by blagie on Monday January 29, 2024 @08:24PM (#39185239)
FYI: Cheap Roombas seem better than expensive ones. I have a random one which bangs around the house for a long time, and the house ends up clean. Push a button, come back an hour later, and you're done.

I like the simplicity.

Re:Amazon terminates iRobot deal, vacuum maker to lay off 31... by nyjah on Monday January 29, 2024 @08:50PM (#39185437)
I agree with this that they are better, but actually before the expensive roomba I had a cheap roomba and it worked terribly. Insisted on shoving itself right under the perfect height furniture. My house is pretty basic. But my brother had similar roomba and I know he had better luck than me, but now has a shark.
Re:Amazon terminates iRobot deal, vacuum maker to lay off 31... by Semaphor on Monday January 29, 2024 @10:27PM (#39186074)
I have a cheap (well, also old, there wasn’t too much else back then, it’s 10 years old) iRobot Roomba 620 and am very happy with it. Extremely repairable, which is not something I read about modern ones of any manufacturer.
Re:Amazon terminates iRobot deal, vacuum maker to lay off 31... by blagie on Tuesday January 30, 2024 @05:40AM (#39188522)
I have a successor, almost identical, but perhaps two generations newer. Upgrades:

- Bigger, better dust bin

- Slightly less dust makes it into the HEPA filter

- Slightly better / cheaper roller design

... and similar details.

A friend gave me their smarter vacuum (which they didn't use), and I hated it:

1) It tried to overthink things and was pretty demanding.

2) It didn't clean as well. My Roomba has a pretty anaemic vacuum, but cleans very well by virtue of going over every place many times in random directions as it bumps along for 30+ minutes. The smart vacuum plotted a course which covered everything once, finished up in record time, and nothing was actually clean.

What's odd is that even now, 2+ decades after launch, so little has improved. What I really want is "cyclone operation," as in any modern dumb vacuum, so most of the dust doesn't make it to the HEPA filter. The design is stupid simple:

- Air comes into a circular container from a hole in the side, so the air spins.

- Suction comes out a hole in the top at a half-way point in the radius of the dust container, while most of the dust wants to stay at the inside or outside

- If you're even more clever, you put the suction at half height, because dust naturally goes to the bottom.

The annoying thing is cleaning or replacing filters.

Re:Amazon terminates iRobot deal, vacuum maker to lay off 31... by faeriechangling on Monday January 29, 2024 @09:28PM (#39185706)
I had one and it got trapped and strangled itself regularly and ran over things and was totally useless. I pretty much wouldn't recommend those basic robot vacuums.
Re:Amazon terminates iRobot deal, vacuum maker to lay off 31... by blagie on Tuesday January 30, 2024 @05:24AM (#39188431)
The "run over things" is almost a feature for me. I run the Roomba a few times a week, and I need to tidy up before. Mess never builds up. It means I keep my floors clean!

The "gets stuck under furniture" is a bug. However, I don't have much furniture at Roomba height. If I did, it'd make the device useless.