News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Solid-state EV batteries now face "production hell". Parent comment

Re:Solid-state EV batteries now face "production hell" by wilg on Sunday January 28, 2024 @02:22AM (#39163278)
Technically the battery gets a teeny bit lighter because of E=mc².
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Solid-state EV batteries now face "production hell" by anyoneamous on Sunday January 28, 2024 @03:24AM (#39163543)
Over long journeys, those 3 nanograms really add up.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Solid-state EV batteries now face "production hell" by fragmede on Sunday January 28, 2024 @03:33AM (#39163594)
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/34421/does-the-m...

It's about a microgram.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Solid-state EV batteries now face "production hell" by hermitdev on Sunday January 28, 2024 @08:52AM (#39165715)
So, in other words, you gained more mass from bugs splating on the windshield than you lost in the battery.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Solid-state EV batteries now face "production hell" by acdha on Sunday January 28, 2024 @09:17AM (#39165988)
Don’t worry, we’ve been working on that:

https://www.science.org/content/article/where-have-all-insec...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Solid-state EV batteries now face "production hell" by bbarnett on Sunday January 28, 2024 @09:18AM (#39166002)
But in the winter, as the cabin warms up, you have fewer air molecules to cart around.
[ Parent | on HN ]