News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The Man Who Carried Computer Science on His Shoulders. Parent comment

Re:The Man Who Carried Computer Science on His Shoulders by litenboll on Friday January 26, 2024 @04:11AM (#39140376)
Maybe I'm stupid, but does he mean that as long as the task at hand is solved it doesn't matter how we categorize it. In the submarine case it would be "move through water", for example. Or is it deeper than that?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Man Who Carried Computer Science on His Shoulders by Uehreka on Friday January 26, 2024 @04:22AM (#39140469)
> does he mean that as long as the task at hand is solved it doesn't matter how we categorize it.

Yes

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Man Who Carried Computer Science on His Shoulders by chongli on Friday January 26, 2024 @07:28AM (#39141905)
Yes. He was interested in problem-solving, not philosophizing. The debates about AI going on right now are the kind he’d prefer to avoid.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Man Who Carried Computer Science on His Shoulders by deltaburnt on Friday January 26, 2024 @08:32AM (#39142401)
To be fair, 10+ years ago this conversation definitely would have been pretty silly. Maybe about as interesting as asking "is there other life in the universe".

No one knows the answer, it's an incredibly over discussed topic, and we won't know for sure for many years.

I think those points still apply to AI intelligence today. However, the power of today's AI greatly outstrips anything Djikstra would have seen in his day.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Man Who Carried Computer Science on His Shoulders by bmoxb on Friday January 26, 2024 @11:05AM (#39144192)
The improvement of AI lately doesn't invalidate his point though. I'm sure submarine technology has similarly improved but it's still irrelevant whether or not a submarine can be said to 'swim' not.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Man Who Carried Computer Science on His Shoulders by eli on Friday January 26, 2024 @11:28AM (#39144480)
He's objecting to the question. How well you feel you can answer it doesn't matter.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Man Who Carried Computer Science on His Shoulders by DrScientist on Friday January 26, 2024 @09:19AM (#39142828)
The point isn't about whether it is unknowable or not - rather does having the answer have any practical value - ie does the attribution of 'thinking' add any value to understanding a program?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Man Who Carried Computer Science on His Shoulders by meiraleal on Friday January 26, 2024 @07:36AM (#39141955)
I think it is about the relevance of anthropomorphizing machines, submarines don't swim.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Man Who Carried Computer Science on His Shoulders by ThomasBHickey on Friday January 26, 2024 @11:23AM (#39144405)
I think he meant it depends on how you define 'swim'
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Man Who Carried Computer Science on His Shoulders by cmiles74 on Friday January 26, 2024 @11:51AM (#39144773)
Is there something here about the terms being sloppy and unscientific, making the answer somewhat useless? Whatever "swimming" or "thinking" might be, it's not something clearly defined.
[ Parent | on HN ]