Re:IPad '4G' claims face scrutiny from UK regulator
by TazeTSchnitzel on Tuesday May 01, 2012 @06:57AM
(#3913740)
Also, isn't the "4G" it has on AT&T in the US not really 4G though? I mean the faster 3G, not LTE of course.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:IPad '4G' claims face scrutiny from UK regulator
by sipefree on Tuesday May 01, 2012 @07:15AM
(#3913775)
There's no one standard definition of "4G". A myriad of differing technologies all claim to be 4G, which is why it's just about impossible for a vendor to produce a device compatible with every one worldwide. If "4G" had a solid definition, and everybody was using it, but iPad didn't support it, then it would be understandable.
Re:IPad '4G' claims face scrutiny from UK regulator
by CraigRood on Tuesday May 01, 2012 @09:23AM
(#3914175)
While I agree theres no standard definition, theres a general agreement between all parties that LTE is "4G" and HSDPA+ is "3G" (or "3.5G" if you will).
To argue the semantics of what "3G" and "4G" really is only confuses customers even more - and thats exactly what Australia and the UK are trying to prevent.