And the feedback was constructive (and easily actionable): be upfront about the very limited platform support, don't waste people's time.
Let's not conflate the open source release -- which is awesome! -- with the poor website design.
You can just disagree next time (if you really want to) without lecturing people on empathy? I think that strategy might work better.
I hope you see the hypocrisy in your complaint about personalizing responses that skirt close to incivility. Not counting this comment, you're by far the worst offender in this thread.
I'm done here.
If I had chosen more direct words, and written my criticism with less emotion, then you clearly wouldn't have any issue with it.
My comment has 81 points at the time of writing this one. Clearly the majority opinion here is that the substance of it was worthwhile.
God forbid humans express emotion on the internet. You are welcome to criticize my expression. To simply filter it out as bad internet speak is, at the very least, a bad strategy.
I don't mean to keep a flagged, unproductive subthread going, but since you're listening to me: stop writing that way on HN. Stop dunking on people's open source projects. Be careful with how you write criticism. The preceding commenter was absolutely right to call out the snark in that comment. If you don't call that stuff out, it spreads like kudzu, and pretty soon we're all just writing Youtube comments. They did you a favor, and you should thank them for it.
> Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes.
> Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work.
Expressing negative opinions is fine. But perhaps you should have a fear of being rude. We are a community, and there's plenty of other people reading these comments. I value kindness and being constructive, neither of which the comment I replied to appear to express.