Re:Train Robbery for Amazon Packages? More Common Than You T...
by Scoundreller on Wednesday January 24, 2024 @04:49PM
(#39123044)
Sure they want their own police. Nothing better than being able to investigate yourself and find you did nothing wrong.
And when you call your local PD, good luck getting anywhere when another police force discontinued the investigation and local PD knows little/nothing about railways.
Canada has similar private rail police and that’s basically what happened at least once: https://theconversation.com/why-major-canadian-railways-must...
Re:Train Robbery for Amazon Packages? More Common Than You T...
by michaelmrose on Wednesday January 24, 2024 @06:18PM
(#39123972)
I think the better question is why are they investigating accidents in the first place instead of limiting jurisdiction exclusively to essentially loss prevention.
Re:Train Robbery for Amazon Packages? More Common Than You T...
by fnordpiglet on Wednesday January 24, 2024 @09:06PM
(#39125399)
$
2. They often have specific laws at a federal level and as I understand it wouldn’t depend on general local courts and prosecutors, particularly on interstate lines. For spur lines it’ll usually be state prosecutors.
The crux of it is the rail companies probably don’t WANT to hire police if they absolutely can avoid it. That’s very expensive and I’m sure they would rather just eat losses, pay insurance premiums, and whine to local and state police for more coverage at the tax payers expense.