Re:OO is not Computing, Newer is not More modern
by pjmlp on Monday April 30, 2012 @12:15PM
(#3909850)
Java at LinkedIn
http://www.infoq.com/news/2010/08/linkedin-data-infrastructu...
Java at Twitter
http://www.readwriteweb.com/cloud/2011/04/twitter-drops-ruby...
Java at Facebook
http://www.infoq.com/presentations/HBase-at-Facebook
Java at Amazon
Re:OO is not Computing, Newer is not More modern
by huggyface on Monday April 30, 2012 @12:24PM
(#3909887)
None of those hold Java as the "Lingua Franca" of the respective companies. Even remotely. No one doubts that you can find Java somewhere in any reasonably sized company, or as a largely inconsequential basis for a product they use (such as HBase), but only extreme hope can lead someone to conclude that makes it a principal technology.
Re:OO is not Computing, Newer is not More modern
by pjmlp on Tuesday May 01, 2012 @07:44AM
(#3913859)
If you cared to read the given links, or even search a bit yourself, you'd see that, for example, Twitter has replaced the original Ruby architecture by Java.
Re:OO is not Computing, Newer is not More modern
by eli_gottlieb on Monday April 30, 2012 @02:48PM
(#3910715)
As far as I know, Java is the lingua franca of Amazon and Google. Facebook uses some, but it's not their standard. LinkedIn and Twitter each use some Java alongside their Scala. Only Apple and Microsoft exclusively use C++ or made their own languages. Google also uses a lot of C++, but they're predominantly on Java.
Oracle likes Java, but that's because their products are largely code produced over a decade ago.