So for instance according to MMT taxes create an ongoing demand for currency and are a tool to take money out of an economy that is getting overheated. This goes against the conventional idea that taxes are primarily meant to provide the government with money to spend to build infrastructure, fund social welfare programs, etc.
It's a bit the same idea with another modern approach FTPL but in that case with a more cautious and critical look, saying that low taxes allow high inflation and prevents the government from the need to pay its debt.
In any case the real question all those systems try to solve is how to best allocate resources, maximize innovation, growth, employment and limit poverty and inequalities. Be careful that thinking that poor people are stealing your resources with taxes don't become a shortcut for you to accept the tough idea that you have more resources than you need and some people should have less than what they need to support you.
Be careful thinking that the only way to help those in need or to redistribute abundance is through the threat of violence.
Edit: I guess formally it's called a goad
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goad
The phrase I'm pulling this from is "don't kick against the pricks"
However, _taxes_ are, at the end of the day, taking money from individuals, via the implicit (and sometimes explicit) threat of violence. Taxes (as in money collected with the threat of violence) are immoral.
Capitalism in it's idealistic state seeks to give everyone agency in what they do, and let the market reward or punish those actions.
However, of course, while communism requires the creation of "the state" (and therefore taxes) to enforce the state of things, capitalism encourages the creation of "the state", so in the end it doesn't really matter.
I guess capitalism gives you a few minutes before "the state" is created.
Social programs are good, in fact, great! Having safety nets lets people take risks they otherwise would not, and it's those risks that can advance society.
However when you knock on my door and say pay for this social program or I will xyz, it's not a social program anymore it's social order at the threat of violence.
The "or else" with social programs needs to be "or else the place that you live will be a terrible place to live"