Re:Open source Spotify client that doesn't require Premium n...
by add-sub-mul-div on Saturday January 20, 2024 @10:09AM
(#39068271)
I used to pay for Spotify but canceled because the player experience was so bad, not because of the cost.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Open source Spotify client that doesn't require Premium n...
by mattgreenrocks on Saturday January 20, 2024 @10:25AM
(#39068469)
I usually keep my opinions on software to myself, but I struggle to understand how the audio playback code path is not rock solid at this point.
It's a state machine. That's it.
Re:Open source Spotify client that doesn't require Premium n...
by add-sub-mul-div on Saturday January 20, 2024 @12:51PM
(#39070276)
It's not audio quality or the specific playback experience I had a problem with. It's all the features around it. I'm used to players like Winamp, foobar2000. Real native applications that are responsive and customizable and feature rich.
Re:Open source Spotify client that doesn't require Premium n...
by empiricus on Saturday January 20, 2024 @01:29PM
(#39070713)
As some basic examples, the spotify app does not have a listening history, or at a minimum some counts and the most listened songs.
Or the app on the samsung tv does not have any setting or information about the audio quality.