They've been replacing licensed map data with data they gather themselves for over half a decade now. So far, their own data covers North America, Europe, Australia as well as a few countries elsewhere. 35 countries so far.
https://techcrunch.com/2018/06/29/apple-is-rebuilding-maps-f...
https://www.justinobeirne.com/new-apple-maps-expansions-curr...
> The main provider of map data is TomTom
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Maps
> contributed none of that back
OpenStreetMap seems to think that Apple contributes both tools and data.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Apple
Almost all of the large tech companies with a mapping product contribute data to OpenStreetMap, with Google being the sole exception that I'm aware of.
Like I said, they contributed nothing from the maps they created from scratch back, only corrections to OpenStreetmap while they were using it.
Yes, openstreetmap's data was WAYYYY better than Apple Maps at launch.
In central London Apple Maps had such bad data that some of the business listings hadn't existed since before Apple Inc was formed as company, which were certainly not problems in openstreetmap.
They most likely just downloaded openstreetmap database and spent nothing. Do you have any source that the logical and easy thing is not what they did?