But that is not a major disadvantage for everyone. It’s a disadvantage in those areas only. Same app version might work great for me, but not for someone else. I wonder if they specifically target improved coverage in areas with most iPhone customers?
Yeah, duh.
However from the original experience with Apple Maps, it was very US-centric and especially California-centric at the start.
And I assume even Americans and Californians want to travel to places with bad coverage.
So yes, this is a total blocker for people that live in those (many?) regions and a major issue even for people that don't live there.
Edit:
https://old.reddit.com/r/applemaps/comments/14wo26t/apple_ma...
Apparently it's basically NA, Western Europe, Australia. So that's what, 1 billion people? The remaining 7+ billion people, tough luck.
That's not as obvious and not true for most applications. A game or a note taking app will be great or crappy regardless of the area. Maps is an application where the same version works great in on area and then completely unusable in another geographical area. That's pretty odd if you think about it. So then it leads to endless debate "It works great for me, better than Google maps" and of course there will be someone who says "NO! It's complete crap and never works". And both may be right.
> And I assume even Americans and Californians want to travel to places with bad coverage.
Most people don't travel that much. iPhone and Apple's ecosystem in general was never positioned as affordable to 7+ billion people everywhere. I don't know if Apple is going to bother mapping details of some remote village just become an iPhone carrying American might visit. Maybe eventually, but they'll start with US probably.
> The remaining 7+ billion people, tough luck.
Sure. Apple doesn't run a charity and providing details and accurate navigation and maps everywhere is not something they're in the business for.
Sorry, is your criticism that this free app is only suitable for 1 billion or so people?
That's a failure from your viewpoint?
OSM has all the mountain trails and caves and hostels, where as gmaps just shows a huge green blob.
Google Maps excels in providing comprehensive information on public transportation routes with much better coverage, but driving routes are equivalent.
4. Eh. We are talking about Apple products so hardly relevant.
Apple successfully displaced Google on its platform with a product that is sometimes better and not particularly worse.
This is factually untrue for most of Australia outside of the cities. I can't validate other countries but its not even close here.
As an example of how messed up it is.
Apple Maps is accessible through the web.
For instance, if you search for a place on DuckDuckGo and then click the Maps button, you get Apple Maps results.
Unless someone can prove me wrong, Google probably has four advantages, and the last two are MAJOR ones.
3. Google Maps probably has MUCH better worldwide coverage. Which means that Apple Maps is useless in large parts of the world.
4. Google Maps can be used on any platform (Android, Windows).