News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on If you can't reproduce the model then it's not open-source. Parent comment

Re:If you can't reproduce the model then it's not open-source by declaredapple on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @03:10PM (#39032785)
I'm speculating they are attempting to avoid controversy about their datasources. That and a possible competitive edge depending on what specific sets/filtering they're using.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:If you can't reproduce the model then it's not open-source by ssgodderidge on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @03:17PM (#39032851)
To avoid controversy AND potential lawsuits.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:If you can't reproduce the model then it's not open-source by declaredapple on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @03:22PM (#39032923)
Yup.

I think many countries (japan already has) will allow IP for training data.

They just need to buy time until then.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:If you can't reproduce the model then it's not open-source by wruza on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @09:47PM (#39036963)
It’s common for third party model testers to not disclose what they mean by “Refusal” parameter as well, for obvious reasons. The world is full of witch-hunting maniacs now and will stay so for an indefinite amount of time. Just wait until the whole thing becomes more widely known and they realize. All AI companies have to hurry up before the doors shut.
[ Parent | on HN ]