Assuming iOS is really vastly better than Android: Isn’t it curious that Google is charging exactly the same rate then?

It’s just not an apples to oranges comparison: One vendor is forcing use of their distribution services; the other just strongly nudges their customers to stay within their walled garden and not enable sideloading.

> They're charging what the market will bear for a _vastly_ better product (iOS vs. Android).

I wonder how you see Qualcomm, being the crushing leader of mobile modem chips.

You're in the "greed" range when you're sued internationaly over how you deal with money and lose in at least one court, at least once.

Apple is in good company in this category.