News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:On being listed as an artist whose work was used to train... by rafaelero on Tuesday January 16, 2024 @05:20PM (#39019953)
You have a three line sentence. Come on. Write clearer.

The reason I said it is unstopable is not because of a philosophical/deterministic argument. It was a figure to speech to verbalize the fact that the incentives are so strong for allowing AI to use copyright data that going against it would be a societal backwards decision. Similar to what avoiding agriculture was for previous societies that don't exist anymore.

Re:On being listed as an artist whose work was used to train... by kelseyfrog on Tuesday January 16, 2024 @05:54PM (#39020298)
I crafted an argument which is impossible to refute. Luckily for you I wrote a different set of words that you took literally(how silly of you). You're more than welcome to still try though.
Re:On being listed as an artist whose work was used to train... by rafaelero on Tuesday January 16, 2024 @06:38PM (#39020779)
Ok