News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:On being listed as an artist whose work was used to train... by skydhash on Tuesday January 16, 2024 @03:13PM (#39018471)
Google translate is very basic and not even close to something good if you already know both languages. Useful if you're translating to your language (you do the correction when reading), but can lead to confusion the other way.
Re:On being listed as an artist whose work was used to train... by s1artibartfast on Tuesday January 16, 2024 @03:34PM (#39018757)
Interesting distinction.

If you can do the correction when reading, it seems reasonable to assume the reader in the opposite direction has the same correction capability.

I would expect the chance of confusion to be identical. The only difference is a matter of perspective, where in one case you are the reader and in one case you are the author.

Re:On being listed as an artist whose work was used to train... by skydhash on Tuesday January 16, 2024 @03:54PM (#39018993)
Yes, they are identical. But I believe the reader is better armed to deal with the confusion, or at least to recognize the error, because it does not fit it. But when producing, you don't know the target language, so there's a better chance for errors to slip in unnoticed.

It's better for me to receive a text in the original language and translate it myself than to try to decipher something translated automatically.