On being listed as an artist whose work was used to train Midjourney

Re:On being listed as an artist whose work was used to train... by rideontime on Tuesday January 16, 2024 @01:32PM (#39016809)

Sorry, this was a joke about the decline of "Gabe's" artistic output. I'd find midjourney's output repulsive no matter what it looked like.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:On being listed as an artist whose work was used to train... by Minor49er on Tuesday January 16, 2024 @01:39PM (#39016944)

Got it. Though Midjourney can certainly be pushed beyond its fingerprint, so you might not be aware that a given image you've seen was generated by it or not

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:On being listed as an artist whose work was used to train... by rideontime on Tuesday January 16, 2024 @03:02PM (#39018301)

Let me be clear: it is the knowledge that an image was created with midjourney that repulses me, not the visual appeal of the image itself.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:On being listed as an artist whose work was used to train... by Minor49er on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @12:16AM (#39023570)

That is unfortunate

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:On being listed as an artist whose work was used to train... by rideontime on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @12:29PM (#39030725)

It is also not an uncommon opinion, which you should keep in mind if you intend to use AI-generated imagery in your products.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:On being listed as an artist whose work was used to train... by Minor49er on Wednesday January 17, 2024 @12:58PM (#39031104)

Actually, it's an opinion that's going to dwindle as AI tooling becomes more commonly available. I am not worried about it

[ Parent | on HN ]