Re:Why LLMs are not and probably will not lead to "AI" (an o...
by LabMechanic on Saturday January 13, 2024 @03:10PM
(#38984036)
You might see them both "being very, very similar", but that does not mean that it is.
I mentioned it countless times already, but it gets tiresome to repeat myself.
Just ask your "AI", capable of "thought", a question (e.g., derive something given a set of axioms and definitions) from a non-widespread field (e.g., perspective geometry, Clifford algebra).
Then you might also arrive at the conclusion that it is a hyped up "Google search results mixer and matcher".
I mentioned it countless times already, but it gets tiresome to repeat myself. Just ask your "AI", capable of "thought", a question (e.g., derive something given a set of axioms and definitions) from a non-widespread field (e.g., perspective geometry, Clifford algebra).
Then you might also arrive at the conclusion that it is a hyped up "Google search results mixer and matcher".