Why LLMs are not and probably will not lead to "AI" (an opion)

Re:Why LLMs are not and probably will not lead to "AI" (an o... by traverseda on Friday January 12, 2024 @02:41PM (#38972912)

Can you elaborate on the distinction you see between prediction and understanding?

I see them both being very very similar, possibly even the same thing. Are you saying a prediction only matters if it was done in a certain way, following a specific thought process?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why LLMs are not and probably will not lead to "AI" (an o... by LabMechanic on Saturday January 13, 2024 @03:10PM (#38984036)

You might see them both "being very, very similar", but that does not mean that it is.

I mentioned it countless times already, but it gets tiresome to repeat myself. Just ask your "AI", capable of "thought", a question (e.g., derive something given a set of axioms and definitions) from a non-widespread field (e.g., perspective geometry, Clifford algebra).

Then you might also arrive at the conclusion that it is a hyped up "Google search results mixer and matcher".

[ Parent | on HN ]