News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Surprising Roots of Ancient Rome's Gladiator Fights by nitwit005 on Friday January 12, 2024 @07:19PM (#38975973)
It was an empire. Empires come into existence through violent conquest. That violence was tolerated, or encouraged, should not be a surprise.

That said, it was 320 pairs of gladiators, so you'd assume 320 deaths or fewer, rather than "over 600".

Re:The Surprising Roots of Ancient Rome's Gladiator Fights by Ekaros on Saturday January 13, 2024 @05:32AM (#38978717)
600 seems high, but in actually fight to death with actual weapons I would expect more than half to die eventually. That is being inflicted with wounds that result death soon after the other person or then just infections.

Trauma medicine and medicine in general was non-existent compared to today. So any open cuts or large amount of bleeding can easily kill person.

Re:The Surprising Roots of Ancient Rome's Gladiator Fights by nitwit005 on Saturday January 13, 2024 @12:37PM (#38982347)
Despite how the article makes it appear, gladiatorial battles were typically not to the death. So while yes, people might die of infection, we don't expect a base rate of half of them dying.