News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Wind turbines are friendlier to birds than oil-and-gas dr... by fsflover on Friday January 12, 2024 @02:46PM (#38972974)
This is an HN comment thread, hence we expect a higher quality of comments than elsewhere on the Internet. Thanks for the links.
Re:Wind turbines are friendlier to birds than oil-and-gas dr... by jf22 on Friday January 12, 2024 @03:18PM (#38973406)
I think there is more of an expectation here to Google simple things for yourself rather than condescendingly ask for a source that is a few keystrokes away.
Re:Wind turbines are friendlier to birds than oil-and-gas dr... by fsflover on Friday January 12, 2024 @04:08PM (#38974097)
Everyone can search things on the Internet. However when I state something on HN, I usually try to add some good links, which are not top Google results. Example: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38725734.
Re:Wind turbines are friendlier to birds than oil-and-gas dr... by naremu on Friday January 12, 2024 @03:59PM (#38973972)
Well quite frankly, saying "the claim that these are lies are just as disingenuous as the claims themselves" is a pretty low quality, classic stick-in-the-spokes "debate" tactic that essentially hand waves the ball back in the other person's court with minimal effort or contribution or real debate and puts maximum onus on someone else in public in the "flow" of discourse.

This is "great" for televised debates but this is kind of passive aggressive for the tone people prefer here. We're talking to people here. More directly than a formal debate.

Someone participating earnestly knows they are capable of either politely expressing interest and asking for sources, or as another mentioned: typing and clicking all by themselves.

Re:Wind turbines are friendlier to birds than oil-and-gas dr... by fsflover on Friday January 12, 2024 @04:11PM (#38974139)
> saying "the claim that these are lies are just as disingenuous as the claims themselves"

I didn't say that, but I do think that providing links is helpful.

Re:Wind turbines are friendlier to birds than oil-and-gas dr... by PaulDavisThe1st on Friday January 12, 2024 @04:20PM (#38974262)
quote: simply saying they're lies is just as disingenuous as the people making the statements in the first place

paraphrase: the claim that these are lies are just as disingenuous as the claims themselves

claim: I didn't say that

I confess that I can't quite see the difference.

Re:Wind turbines are friendlier to birds than oil-and-gas dr... by fsflover on Friday January 12, 2024 @04:44PM (#38974550)
I'm not @jairuhme.
Re:Wind turbines are friendlier to birds than oil-and-gas dr... by PaulDavisThe1st on Friday January 12, 2024 @05:28PM (#38975002)
Ah, entirely fair point! :) Sorry about that.
Re:Wind turbines are friendlier to birds than oil-and-gas dr... by tdb7893 on Friday January 12, 2024 @03:35PM (#38973633)
The opinion that HN has particularly high quality comments is always surprising to me. Outside of the times where the person commenting is the actual creator of whatever the post is about I've found comments here to be a dumpster fire to the point where I often have fun looking at them specifically because they are often so wild and I love a good mess.

I assume people here will disagree but it's that exact stark difference in perspective that's so interesting to me

Re:Wind turbines are friendlier to birds than oil-and-gas dr... by fsflover on Friday January 12, 2024 @03:58PM (#38973955)
I definitely noticed that the quality of the comments here is often better than simply stating some opinion. The latter is typical for social media echo chambers but not here.
Re:Wind turbines are friendlier to birds than oil-and-gas dr... by PawgerZ on Monday January 15, 2024 @12:30PM (#39003520)
I agree with everything you said, yet I still believe HN comments are regularly the most high quality on the internet. Do you know anywhere that has better comments than HN?