News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Outlook is Microsoft's new data collection service by tmikaeld on Thursday January 11, 2024 @01:07PM (#38956110)
> Unencrypted web traffic?

I don't know if you're aware, but basically all sites on the internet use something called SSL these days. However, SSL is useless if you use a VPN that also provide DNS servers (which most do) - because the provider could listen in on all of your traffic by hijacking the handshake, DNS and traffic to and from any target server - making it much easier to create a user profile, because you're authenticated to the VPN.

Also, third party cookies are blocked in the mainline browsers by default, making VPNs even more useless.

Most if not all of the ISPs also use dynamic IPs, making it unlikely to be cross-site-tracked based on IP sources.

Re:Outlook is Microsoft's new data collection service by moose44 on Thursday January 11, 2024 @02:00PM (#38957044)
What does that have to do with your ISP having access to this information and selling it? In addition to using public networks?

Additionally, 3rd party cookies may be blocked but cross-site are not.

Re:Outlook is Microsoft's new data collection service by tmikaeld on Friday January 12, 2024 @02:22AM (#38965081)
You realize 3rd party cookies and cross-site cookies are the same thing?
Re:Outlook is Microsoft's new data collection service by syntheticcorp on Thursday January 11, 2024 @08:24PM (#38962274)
Control over a clients DNS doesn’t let the VPN provider view the contents of TLS encrypted traffic. However they can view unencrypted data from connections like SNI headers, DNS queries etc.
Re:Outlook is Microsoft's new data collection service by tmikaeld on Friday January 12, 2024 @01:09AM (#38964550)
The point here is that if you use someone else’s dns, they can redirect any domain to their server and sign the cert too since they also control the traffic.
Re:Outlook is Microsoft's new data collection service by syntheticcorp on Friday January 12, 2024 @12:41PM (#38971259)
You can’t serve a valid certificate chain to the client even if you control their traffic, because your malicious certificate isn’t signed by a trusted CA. And you can’t get a CA signature without demonstrating control of the domain to a CA.