News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Netflix never used its $1M algorithm (2012). Parent comment

Re:Netflix never used its $1M algorithm (2012) by imbnwa on Wednesday January 10, 2024 @08:58PM (#38946437)
Apple isn’t interested in replacing Netflix, they’re purposely keeping it “small batch artisanal”
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Netflix never used its $1M algorithm (2012) by yincrash on Thursday January 11, 2024 @12:28AM (#38948119)
"It's not TV, it's _Apple tv+_"
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Netflix never used its $1M algorithm (2012) by jacoblambda on Wednesday January 10, 2024 @09:33PM (#38946718)
Isn't apple tv currently in talks to merge with paramount plus?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Netflix never used its $1M algorithm (2012) by jmisavage on Wednesday January 10, 2024 @09:55PM (#38946902)
Nope. You’re thinking of Warner Brothers Discovery and Paramount.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Netflix never used its $1M algorithm (2012) by jacoblambda on Wednesday January 10, 2024 @10:49PM (#38947326)
https://www.tomsguide.com/news/apple-tv-plus-and-paramount-p...

?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Netflix never used its $1M algorithm (2012) by klausa on Wednesday January 10, 2024 @11:52PM (#38947781)
A "bundle" and "merger" are a very different things.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Netflix never used its $1M algorithm (2012) by dataflow on Wednesday January 10, 2024 @11:54PM (#38947790)
Merge or bundle? Merge is a company thing, bundle is a product thing.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Netflix never used its $1M algorithm (2012) by jerrysievert on Wednesday January 10, 2024 @11:25PM (#38947575)
oh, that would be horrible, I canceled "max" after the discovery takeover, I'd hate to cancel paramount+ as well, they have a good catalog that discovery would eviscerate.
[ Parent | on HN ]