News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The New York Times Launches a Strong Case Against Microso... by tourmalinetaco on Sunday January 07, 2024 @10:34AM (#38902032)
I have a similar hobby of sorts I occasionally pick up and drop off, except of unattributed quotes. Some are easy (“Who shall deliver me from this turbulent priest?”), while some I still cannot find the exact quote from, even while knowing what should be the source material (“It was wintertide at Camelot. The rich brotherhood did rightly revel, and mirthful was their mood. Oft-times on tourney bent those gallants sought the field, Though like as joust those gentle knights did sally with missiles made of snow and laughingly grapple on slippery ground.”).

It’s certainly highlighted to me how difficult information upkeep can be, and is a strong reminder to source myself as soon as possible. Which is a realistic and ideal expectation for NN, as alongside their training weights ideally their training dataset is searchable and attributable. Otherwise I feel the largest strength of a dataset, being a digital library for the NN and thus us, is lost.

Re:The New York Times Launches a Strong Case Against Microso... by Baldbvrhunter on Sunday January 07, 2024 @11:53AM (#38902780)
> “Who shall deliver me from this turbulent priest?”

Robert Dodsley

Re:The New York Times Launches a Strong Case Against Microso... by mistrial9 on Sunday January 07, 2024 @12:30PM (#38903124)
Re:The New York Times Launches a Strong Case Against Microso... by Baldbvrhunter on Sunday January 07, 2024 @12:36PM (#38903183)
if you read your link you'll see that the "quote" is what Robert Dodsley said about it 600 years later, and then changed it in the second edition