Re:Systemd through the eyes of a musl distribution maintainer
by milliams on Saturday January 06, 2024 @09:29AM
(#38891684)
There's a willingness from the systemd devs to start incorporating Rust into it, possibly quite soon: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/19598
Re:Systemd through the eyes of a musl distribution maintainer
by habitue on Saturday January 06, 2024 @09:55AM
(#38891883)
From 2021?
Re:Systemd through the eyes of a musl distribution maintainer
by notamy on Saturday January 06, 2024 @10:22AM
(#38892136)
The original PR is from 2021, but there's been activity on it that's less than a month old indicating that it's still wanted, especially as the kernel starts to integrate Rust.
Re:Systemd through the eyes of a musl distribution maintainer
by dwattttt on Saturday January 06, 2024 @07:23PM
(#38897027)
Ah, because while systemd is divisive, couldn't it be _more_ divisive?
Re:Systemd through the eyes of a musl distribution maintainer
by bmicraft on Saturday January 06, 2024 @07:40PM
(#38897133)
This choice literally only affects contributors and packagers for distros. If you even notice it at all as a user, it should only be through a very slight reduction in crashes.
Re:Systemd through the eyes of a musl distribution maintainer
by nerdponx on Saturday January 06, 2024 @09:14AM
(#38891593)
If you're just looking for init and service management, the S6 system (and its wrapper 66suite) are pretty good. It's the only alternative that seems to match Systemd for feeling like a modern tool in my opinion, rather than a relic of the old days.
Re:Systemd through the eyes of a musl distribution maintainer
by throwaway7356 on Saturday January 06, 2024 @11:37AM
(#38892808)
Don't want s6 as it brings with it a binary configuration database (Windows registry). systemd at least has text files for config.
Re:Systemd through the eyes of a musl distribution maintainer
by egberts1 on Saturday January 06, 2024 @03:09PM
(#38894927)
My sole resistance to s6, binary config AND default-all privilege for spawned daemon.
Better to stick with INI v1.4 format.
Re:Systemd through the eyes of a musl distribution maintainer
by yencabulator on Saturday January 06, 2024 @11:12PM
(#38898357)
Sorry, where's the binary configuration database in S6? The config looked like a collection of directories with scripts to run to start things.
EDIT: Ah, you might mean https://skarnet.org/software/s6-rc/s6-rc-compile.html -- that indeed is getting to be weirdly complex.
Re:Systemd through the eyes of a musl distribution maintainer
by generalizations on Saturday January 06, 2024 @10:42AM
(#38892316)
Been watching that for a couple years now. At one point there were plans to integrate with alpine Linux, but it wasn’t ready yet. Has there been progress towards that?
Re:Systemd through the eyes of a musl distribution maintainer
by awilfox on Saturday January 06, 2024 @10:47AM
(#38892368)
Yes, there is some progress it seems: https://skarnet.com/projects/service-manager.html
Re:Systemd through the eyes of a musl distribution maintainer
by KillingSpark on Sunday January 07, 2024 @12:54AM
(#38898873)
I'm Just going to plug myself here:
https://github.com/KillingSpark/rustysd
Rustysd is a reimplantation of the core features of the systemd service manager with a deliberate focus on less features so it can work on more platforms (e.g. BSD)
It's been a while since I actively progressed on the project but it works and would probably be a good starting point for anyone wanting to do further work in this direction.
Reimplementing such a massive piece of infrastructure is pretty daunting. I don't think many people who are not being paid to would embark on it and then keep up the momentum to actually cover all those edge cases and maintain a community around it.
Rewriting things in rust seems to be pretty motivating though, so maybe it could be a force for good here