News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Boeing wants FAA to exempt MAX 7 from safety rules to get... by KingOfCoders on Saturday January 06, 2024 @12:33AM (#38888735)
"All the engineering ethics in the world does nothing against the greed of Boeing's management. "

Sure managers are guilty.

But managers did not write the code. "Engineers" did.

As long as there are engineers writing that code (also see VW and #Dieselgate) there will be managers who do this. Engineers need to take a stand and don't do everything. Like professionals. "He made me do it" is not an excuse for hundreds of dead people.

Re:Boeing wants FAA to exempt MAX 7 from safety rules to get... by roughly on Saturday January 06, 2024 @02:41AM (#38889364)
I generally agree that one has an ethical duty to be accountable for the output of one’s work, but I also worked with a fellow at a previous job who stuck around long after I’d pulled the chute because his daughter had a medical issue and he couldn’t risk losing insurance. It’s not always that cut and dry, and until we’ve got UBI, universal health care, and a reasonable immigration system, the blame is and must remain on the managers first and foremost.
Re:Boeing wants FAA to exempt MAX 7 from safety rules to get... by KingOfCoders on Saturday January 06, 2024 @02:59AM (#38889459)
"UBI, universal health care"

I have UBI.

Re:Boeing wants FAA to exempt MAX 7 from safety rules to get... by roughly on Saturday January 06, 2024 @02:09PM (#38894283)
You have BI. It’s not UBI until the rest of us have it, too.
Re:Boeing wants FAA to exempt MAX 7 from safety rules to get... by knifie_spoonie on Saturday January 06, 2024 @12:48AM (#38888797)
Managers are the ones with the authority to tell engineers what to do. If an engineer refuses, they'll simply be replaced with someone more pliable.

See the Challenger disaster for a high profile example.

Re:Boeing wants FAA to exempt MAX 7 from safety rules to get... by KingOfCoders on Saturday January 06, 2024 @02:04AM (#38889175)
"replaced with someone more pliable."

If I don't rob the bank, someone else will!

Yes, and then the other engineer is responsible for the dead people, not you. But if your job is more important than other peoples lifes, I guess, yes, you do as you have been told.

Re:Boeing wants FAA to exempt MAX 7 from safety rules to get... by knifie_spoonie on Saturday January 06, 2024 @05:20AM (#38890186)
"If I don't rob the bank, someone else will!"

Or maybe we stop people from trying to force others to rob banks. Nip the problem in the bud.

Why do you want to let managers get away with toxic behavior and then blame the subordinates?

Re:Boeing wants FAA to exempt MAX 7 from safety rules to get... by KingOfCoders on Saturday January 06, 2024 @06:39AM (#38890602)
Me: "Sure managers are guilty."

You: "Why do you want to let managers get away with toxic behavior."

Re:Boeing wants FAA to exempt MAX 7 from safety rules to get... by oefnak on Saturday January 06, 2024 @01:45AM (#38889082)
Okay, then that replacement should also refuse or go to jail.
Re:Boeing wants FAA to exempt MAX 7 from safety rules to get... by knifie_spoonie on Saturday January 06, 2024 @05:18AM (#38890178)
Crazy idea, but maybe the manager trying to force engineers to do these things should be held accountable.
Re:Boeing wants FAA to exempt MAX 7 from safety rules to get... by uxp8u61q on Saturday January 06, 2024 @03:06AM (#38889501)
They're just following orders, is that it?
Re:Boeing wants FAA to exempt MAX 7 from safety rules to get... by KingOfCoders on Saturday January 06, 2024 @04:56AM (#38890057)
We Germans know how to do that!
Re:Boeing wants FAA to exempt MAX 7 from safety rules to get... by knifie_spoonie on Saturday January 06, 2024 @05:22AM (#38890196)
Since when did we start apologizing for people in positions of authority forcing others to bad things?
Re:Boeing wants FAA to exempt MAX 7 from safety rules to get... by uxp8u61q on Saturday January 06, 2024 @11:29AM (#38892749)
"Forcing"? Are they holding a gun to the devs' heads and "forcing" them to implement safety circumvention features? I doubt it.
Re:Boeing wants FAA to exempt MAX 7 from safety rules to get... by tremon on Saturday January 06, 2024 @09:56AM (#38891901)
As long as writing code is not an actual engineering profession with the associated authority and liability -- no, you're wrong. The code was not written by (certified) engineers, it was written by programmers. And programmers do not have the authority to refuse their manager's orders.
Re:Boeing wants FAA to exempt MAX 7 from safety rules to get... by snakeyjake on Saturday January 06, 2024 @10:15AM (#38892068)
>And programmers do not have the authority to refuse their manager's orders.

All free people have the authority to refuse their manager's orders.

But people like money.

Re:Boeing wants FAA to exempt MAX 7 from safety rules to get... by reticulan on Saturday January 06, 2024 @11:17AM (#38892630)
They don't like money, they need it to survive (e.g. to not lose employer provided health insurance)