News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Go: What We Got Right, What We Got Wrong by bborud on Friday January 05, 2024 @05:00AM (#38877402)
It may help to understand the context. At the time Go was created you could choose between three languages at Google: Python, C++ and Java.

Well, to be honest, if you chose Python you were kind of looked down on as a bit of a loser() at Google, so there was really two languages: C++ and Java.

Weeeell, to be honest, if you chose Java you would not be working on anything that was really performance critical so there was really just one language: C++.

So we wrote lots and lots of servers in C++. Even those who strictly speaking didn't have to be very fast. That wasn't the nicest experience in the world. Not least because C++ is ancient and the linking stage would end up being a massive bottleneck during large builds. But also because C++ has a lot of sharp edges. And while the bro coders would never admit that they were wasting time looking over their shoulder, the grown ups started taking this seriously as a problem. A problem major enough to warrant having some really good people look into remedying that.

So yes, at Google, Go did replace lots of C++ and did so successfully.

() Yes, that sentiment was expressed. Sometimes by people whose names would be very familiar to you.

Re:Go: What We Got Right, What We Got Wrong by sebastianz on Friday January 05, 2024 @05:58AM (#38877776)
> At the time Go was created you could choose between three languages at Google: Python, C++ and Java.

Out of curiosity, what languages can you currently choose from at Google?

Re:Go: What We Got Right, What We Got Wrong by ncruces on Friday January 05, 2024 @10:11AM (#38879856)
Just you guess: Python, C++ and Java… and Go.

Or JavaScript, Dart, Objective-C, Swift, Rust; even C#. But then it depends on the problem domain. Google it huge, so it depends. And that's even if you pick Python, C++, Java or Go. So your team will already have it decided for you.

Re:Go: What We Got Right, What We Got Wrong by bborud on Friday January 05, 2024 @10:18AM (#38879925)
I haven't worked there for a long time so I wouldn't know. I don't even know if they are still as disciplined about what languages are allowed and how those languages are used.

Can someone still at Google chime in on this?

Re:Go: What We Got Right, What We Got Wrong by bborud on Friday January 05, 2024 @11:34AM (#38880968)
(sorry about the asterisk causing everything to be in itallics. forgot about formatting directives when adding footnote)
Re:Go: What We Got Right, What We Got Wrong by ackfoobar on Friday January 05, 2024 @04:48PM (#38885430)
I initially thought it was a stylistic choice to make the word "loser" a function invocation.