News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Power over fiber by onionisafruit on Thursday January 04, 2024 @07:22AM (#38866100)
What does that mean? I read it as people who have already lost an eye shouldn’t risk their only remaining eye, but I think I’m missing something.
Re:Power over fiber by tgsovlerkhgsel on Thursday January 04, 2024 @07:59AM (#38866457)
It's tongue-in-cheek, implying that many people working with the stuff already lost an eye to it.

It's part joke and part telling people "hey, this stuff is really dangerous, take it seriously or you'll lose an eye, or both". I don't think I've seen a single lab with high-powered lasers that didn't have a variant of this sign.

A similar popular sign for chemical labs is "Carol Never Wore Her Safety Goggles. Now She Doesn't Need Them", depicting a blind woman with sunglasses and a white cane. (https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/carols-safety-goggles)

Re:Power over fiber by jakderrida on Thursday January 04, 2024 @09:41AM (#38867541)
I didn't know labs hang up such brutal memes. I am curious, though, why they made Carol a girl. No way chemical labs have a gender balance that, alone, would justify that decision. Never has portraying more women in STEM made me laugh this hard.
Re:Power over fiber by NickM on Thursday January 04, 2024 @09:49AM (#38867644)
I am curious, though, why they made Carol a girl.

I guess depending on your political agenda they were either trying to be inclusive and promoting gender diversity in STEM, or they were being subtly misogynistic by implying that women aren't as careful as men.

Or maybe it was just arbitrary and maybe we don't have to read anything into it? But what do I know.

Re:Power over fiber by jakderrida on Thursday January 04, 2024 @09:53AM (#38867698)
> I guess depending on your political agenda they were either trying to be inclusive and promoting gender diversity in STEM, or they were being subtly misogynistic by implying that women aren't as careful as men.

Nah, I actually believe it's the first one. That's why it's so hilarious. The irony is what it insinuates about what happens to women in STEM.

Re:Power over fiber by sjsdaiuasgdia on Thursday January 04, 2024 @10:34AM (#38868190)
Alternate idea: they weren't thinking about gender at all. Maybe that was the first hit for "blind person clipart" and they just went with the perceived gender of the person in the image.
Re:Power over fiber by ExoticPearTree on Thursday January 04, 2024 @10:35AM (#38868203)
@jakderrida - it doesn't really matter what Carol's gender is, it is about the message. And on that note, you added zero value to the conversation.
Re:Power over fiber by jakderrida on Thursday January 04, 2024 @12:53PM (#38870089)
If it didn't matter, snowflakes like you wouldn't feel compelled to reply. All I did was mention it was humorous. If cringe were currency, then maybe your comment has value.
Re:Power over fiber by BobaFloutist on Thursday January 04, 2024 @10:40AM (#38868280)
IIRC it came from a (mixed gender) series, and the one with Carol was just the one that people found funny enough that it stuck.
Re:Power over fiber by fullspectrumdev on Thursday January 04, 2024 @10:18AM (#38867978)
The vast majority of the lab techs at both unis I attended were women.

Women outnumbered men in my chemistry course.

Re:Power over fiber by ta988 on Thursday January 04, 2024 @09:58AM (#38867751)
Depends on the domain. Biology labs are often composed of more women than men. Chemistry tend to be the opposite.

And they both use substances that would destroy your eyes.

Re:Power over fiber by jakderrida on Thursday January 04, 2024 @10:07AM (#38867858)
It's the irony that I find hilarious. I imagine them saying, "We should make it a woman to portray more women in STEM" while completely neglecting that she's a cautionary tale.
Re:Power over fiber by bipson on Thursday January 04, 2024 @09:48AM (#38867638)
Inclusion goes both ways?

On a serious note: What are you on about?

Re:Power over fiber by jakderrida on Thursday January 04, 2024 @10:00AM (#38867789)
> Inclusion goes both ways?

Yes, I agree. That's why making it a girl is so hilarious. As to why you're so offended that I find it hilarious, I honestly don't know what to tell you. It's funny for the same reason I'll refer to a hypothetical serial killer as "him" and follow by saying "or her, of course" to females as if I'm pandering. The joke is that they weren't offended to be excluded from being serial killers.

Re:Power over fiber by bipson on Thursday January 04, 2024 @11:22AM (#38868835)
It's not hilarious.

And I'm not offended. I just have zero idea what your issue is. I never gave it any second thought what gender the person is. I don't care and I wonder what you're reading into it.

Re:Power over fiber by afandian on Thursday January 04, 2024 @07:30AM (#38866168)
I think part of the joke is that damage is instantaneous so if you’re not prepared you can’t take evasive action.
Re:Power over fiber by I_Am_Nous on Thursday January 04, 2024 @09:23AM (#38867318)
On top of this, we can't see 800 nm light. That's well into the Infrared band so "invisible lightsaber for your eyes" is an exaggeration, but helps visualize what you could be dealing with.
Re:Power over fiber by ttoinou on Thursday January 04, 2024 @07:23AM (#38866107)
Yeah it's provocatively funny
Re:Power over fiber by onionisafruit on Thursday January 04, 2024 @07:29AM (#38866161)
Thanks. I must be awake too early because it didn’t occur to me the sign is a joke.
Re:Power over fiber by thriftwy on Thursday January 04, 2024 @09:50AM (#38867655)
The joke being is that's not a joke.
Re:Power over fiber by ttoinou on Thursday January 04, 2024 @08:50PM (#38874755)
It's a quantum joke
Re:Power over fiber by redog on Thursday January 04, 2024 @09:02AM (#38867052)
I think that sometimes when humor is added, in this way, it is to make you pause first.

At least in my mind when I encounter something oddly said/written my mind starts suggesting contexts and I can clearly "see" myself going blind by doing me like things.

Re:Power over fiber by marcosdumay on Thursday January 04, 2024 @09:41AM (#38867538)
It emphasizes that you will only notice there's something dangerous around after you are already blind.

It's a very well worded warning, that spread because it's effective. The official warning saying that you must take precautions even if you don't see anything wrong just doesn't work well.