News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:All DMCA Notices Filed Against TorrentFreak in 2023 Were ... by roblabla on Monday January 01, 2024 @08:49PM (#38837184)
Do you have a source for that? I don't see anything in the US constitution being remotely close to Intellectual Property protection. It does have several protection on property, but I'm pretty sure it's talking about the physical kind.
Re:All DMCA Notices Filed Against TorrentFreak in 2023 Were ... by zmgsabst on Monday January 01, 2024 @09:11PM (#38837289)
Article I, Section 8, Clause 8:

> “To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries.”

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/article-1/section-8...

Re:All DMCA Notices Filed Against TorrentFreak in 2023 Were ... by ncallaway on Monday January 01, 2024 @10:55PM (#38837921)
That is a power granted to congress, not a constitutional right.

That is, the constitution grants Congress the authority to create a legislative IP right. It does not create a constitutional IP right.

You can tell, because Congress could say: “stuff it, no IP rights for anyone. Copyright no longer exists for new works”, and that would be constitutional.

Re:All DMCA Notices Filed Against TorrentFreak in 2023 Were ... by Retric on Tuesday January 02, 2024 @07:29PM (#38849141)
People interpret the constitution in different ways, but this is commonly interpreted as a requirement not just a power. Critically, this stuff is interpreted by the Supreme Court not simply anyone so someone could bring a case should congress fail to provide any protection.

Thus congress could specify that copyright only lasts for 1 month, but they can’t just ignore it or set it to 1 second without the courts getting involved.