We don't allow ad hominem attacks here, Andrew. You made uncited assertions, got an uncited assertion in response, and then made this wonderful contribution to the discussion.
It’s also (usually) a given on HN to not post unsubstantiated and pretty controversial claims with no additional interesting or intellectually stimulating context for people for people to discuss, then accuse people of being a “CCP account” when someone points this out.
Edit: and posting a gigantic list of sources as a “gotcha” doesn’t count as additional interesting context, or even words of your own.
Try rephrasing your points in a way that is clearly meant to incite an argument and wouldn’t be best read as if you are shouting.
Apart from that, the strong family tie culture in China, and the "Hukou" system(imo it’s not a good system at today), especially the rural type of Hukou granting the usage of lands almost ensures in the end there will be a place for people to live without being homeless.
Will there be economic recession? Likely yes, are there homeless people? Absolutely. Will there be massively increase of homelessness due to this recession in China? It’s very unlikely.
One needs to travel to China and living for months to understand the culture there and how the Hukou separate urban and rural people, and how it’s related to the land policy to understand why it is very hard for China to have massive homeless as much as we had here at SF.