News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Email addresses are not good 'permanent' identifiers for ... by javajosh on Sunday December 31, 2023 @11:08AM (#38824990)
How is urinating in public a sex offense? I'm releasing urine not having sex with it.
Re:Email addresses are not good 'permanent' identifiers for ... by codetrotter on Sunday December 31, 2023 @11:13AM (#38825034)
Because in order to pee you have to expose your genitalia. I suppose the laws were made so that anyone exposing genitalia could be charged for it.

That being said, it is completely stupid that people are actually made to register as sex offenders when they really were just peeing. Doubly so when they did so without anyone other than themselves seeing their private parts.

Re:Email addresses are not good 'permanent' identifiers for ... by kshacker on Sunday December 31, 2023 @01:33PM (#38826282)
> in order to pee you have to expose your genitalia

They should visit India once. Of course many people will pee against an object (wall, tree) but at times not so hidden

Incidentally saw this funny discussion yesterday (the comments are funny): https://www.reddit.com/r/unitedstatesofindia/comments/18ufbu...

I think these United States have gone way above and beyond their duty as far as calling people sex offenders (not saying that Indians are right)

Re:Email addresses are not good 'permanent' identifiers for ... by popcalc on Sunday December 31, 2023 @06:24PM (#38828371)
You just need to go as far as Budapest.
Re:Email addresses are not good 'permanent' identifiers for ... by pavel_lishin on Monday January 01, 2024 @12:51PM (#38833649)
You just need to go as far as Brooklyn on the subway.
Re:Email addresses are not good 'permanent' identifiers for ... by yywwbbn on Friday January 05, 2024 @08:19AM (#38878750)
Did this actually ever happen to anyone recently? I assumed it’s just mostly a myth
Re:Email addresses are not good 'permanent' identifiers for ... by pc86 on Sunday December 31, 2023 @12:26PM (#38825682)
Pee in public within a certain distance of a school and you'll probably find out.
Re:Email addresses are not good 'permanent' identifiers for ... by bigstrat2003 on Sunday December 31, 2023 @12:12PM (#38825544)
Because the law is badly written sometimes.
Re:Email addresses are not good 'permanent' identifiers for ... by mythrwy on Sunday December 31, 2023 @07:15PM (#38828618)
I know a guy that happened to. He was drunk and urinating by the side of the road in plain view and wound up registered as a sex offender. West Texas.

This is his story that I've not independently verified, but I don't think he was an actual sex offender from what I knew of him. He was certainly a drunk though.

Re:Email addresses are not good 'permanent' identifiers for ... by BeFlatXIII on Monday January 01, 2024 @10:07AM (#38832235)
Because people may wee your weewee.