Re:Amazon's Silent Sacking
by rsanek on Saturday December 30, 2023 @08:19PM
(#38820950)
I think Twitter provides a case study here. The site is still working fine despite being staffed by only 20% of the employees it had just over a year ago.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
I take a middle position on this having seen it all at Twitter since 2006. The site does still work, but not without outages. Of course, Twitter had major outages during the Williams/Costello/Dorsey period as well. What happened was that when Musk obtained control, the haters claimed that Twitter/X would burn down or get bricked. None of that ever happened, which leads some people to believe it "still works fine" with 20% of the former staff.
Re:Amazon's Silent Sacking
by PH95VuimJjqBqy on Sunday December 31, 2023 @02:54AM
(#38822525)
you'll have to define what "it still works fine" means then, because your description certainly would meet my definition of the phrase.
Re:Amazon's Silent Sacking
by hermanradtke on Saturday December 30, 2023 @11:03PM
(#38821662)
> site is still working fine
Twitter has had a lot of issues and generally failing as a company at the moment.
Yea, I think we still need to wait and see. Airplanes keep gliding when you turn the engine off. I think Twitter is still in the "Wile-E-Coyote ran off the cliff but hasn't started falling yet" phase.
Re:Amazon's Silent Sacking
by VirusNewbie on Saturday December 30, 2023 @11:37PM
(#38821852)
It has had major outages and is losing a ton of money.
Re:Amazon's Silent Sacking
by local_crmdgeon on Saturday December 30, 2023 @10:26PM
(#38821468)
Twitter and Amazon are not similar companies and cannot be compared in terms of scale.
No one has Amazons scale.